Zimbardo, however, has defended his results and stated that these criticisms are misrepresenting his study and the experiences of the people in it. Beyond that, some psychologists doubt the core findings of the experiment and claim that the cruelty didn’t emerge organically, but was instead influenced by Zimbardo nudging the experiment in that direction. After all, it’s hard to give fully informed consent when there’s no way to predict how events could unfold. Many modern-day researchers don’t believe the experiment can be replicated because it doesn’t meet today’s research ethics standards-namely, informed consent. The experiment was disbanded on day six, after an outside observer witnessed the upsetting events taking place and sounded the alarm. Over the next few days, some of the prisoners were so traumatized that they were pulled out. The prisoners were “arrested,” taken to a fake prison in the basement of a school building, then made to wear a dress-like prison uniform with chains around their right ankle.īy the second day, the faux prisoners had revolted. Each was paid $15 per day for his participation in the study, which was supposed to last two weeks. To start, 24 young men were assigned the roles of prison guard or prison inmate, with some held back as alternates. Lead researcher Philip Zimbardo had predicted that situations and circumstances dictate how a person acts, not their personalities. Office of Naval Research, was to measure the effect of role-playing and social expectations. The point of the experiment, which was funded by the U.S. You may have heard about the Stanford Prison Experiment, a social psychology study gone awry in 1971. While Gua wasn’t showing any signs of picking up English, Donald had started to imitate the vocalizations of his sister from another species-so it’s not hard to speculate why the Kelloggs called it quits. But she eventually plateaued, and it became evident that no amount of equal treatment was going to make her behave more like a human (for example, she was never going to be able to speak English).īut when the Kelloggs ended the experiment, they did so abruptly and without much explanation, which is contrary to the meticulous records they otherwise took throughout the course of the study. Gua initially did better than Donald in tests that included things like memory, scribbling, strength, dexterity, reflexes, problem-solving, climbing, language comprehension, and more. He did the opposite: He managed to get his hands on a similar-aged baby chimp named Gua and raised her alongside Donald. The psychologist had grown interested in those stories of children who were raised feral-but he didn’t send Donald to be raised by wolves. In the early 1930s, comparative psychologist Winthrop Kellogg and his wife welcomed a healthy baby boy they named Donald.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |